Kipling’s Gods explain the Bhagavad-Gita, and the mixture of varnas in Pittsburgh

Via Kasimir Petrenko:
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/07/15/hedgepath-murder-in-nc-editors-note-comments-have-been-disabled-due-to-the-nature-of-this-story/


http://kdka.com/local/Sheraden.stabbing.death.2.1807769.html

A convicted sex offender is in police custody accused in the stabbing death of a 14-year-old girl whose body was dumped outside Langley High School. 

Police say Tushon Brown, 35, is in a North Carolina jail on a probation violation; but he will be brought back to Pittsburgh to face charges in the murder of Lauren Deis, 14.

Brown is facing charges in Pittsburgh of criminal homicide, statutory sexual assault, failure to comply with registration of sexual offenders, tampering with evidence and abuse of a corpse.

According to investigators, Deis was in Sheraden on July 7 spending some time with a friend. She had a chance meeting with Brown and the two went to his Glen Mawr Street home where they had sex.

The criminal complaint goes on to say that Brown gave Deis $200 beforehand and then he wanted the money back. He said she wasn’t worth the money. The two started fighting. KDKA’s Ralph Iannotti reports Brown got scared and angry and that he claims Deis stabbed him so then he began stabbing her repeatedly and ended up killing her.

A police report states Brown placed the body in the basement on July 7 and on July 13 he placed the body near a dumpster at Langley High School.

Police saw surveillance video of Brown’s wife’s Chevy Malibu at the high school and that was one of the big breaks in the investigation.

“This case here we had some evidence,” Pittsburgh Police Commander Thomas Stangrecki said. “We were able to work off some surveillance video and some other tips led to the identity of Mr. Brown. Unfortunately we did work very hard on this case, but it doesn’t bring back Lauren.”

The police criminal complaint states Brown had sex with the 14-year-old in the basement after he brought her body down from the bedroom because he said he was angry and frustrated.

Commenter MGLS pointed to this story:
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/pittsburgh/s_690370.html

“I got a kinda complicated thing going on with someone,” Lauren said on her Facebook profile, where she described herself as a bisexual “raver and a smoker.” On her MySpace page, where she posted a picture of herself holding a bottle of vodka, she listed her age as 19 and talked about men, smoking and drinking. Her eyebrow, nose and tongue were pierced.
“Life’s a bitch and then you die, so (expletive) the world and let’s get high,” she wrote on Facebook.

Lauren’s troubles began in 2003, when she was 7 and her father died of an accidental drug overdose in San Diego, relatives said. Lisa Annette Deis, 45, moved her children to Monroeville and then to Churchill. Police arrested Lauren’s mother on charges of drunken and careless driving in 2006 and for drug possession in January 2007, court records show.

By the time Lauren was 12, police had cited her for underage drinking, relatives and friends said. Placed in Allegheny County’s foster care system, she lived and attended school in the Mars Home for Youth.

The Bhagavad-Gita might describe this killing as the result of the mixture of varnas.

1:40. With the destruction of the family perish the age-old traditions; and when virtue is lost vice overcomes entire family;
1:41. Krishna, when vice prevails the women of the family become unchaste; the corruption of women leads to mixture of the varnas.
1:42. The mixture of the varnas ensures hell both for the destroyers of the family and for the family itself, since the souls of ancestors languish because of lack of offerings of rice and water.
1:43. By the sin of these family-destroyers, that caused intermixture of the varnas, the ancient caste and family virtues are ruined too.


http://www.religiousbook.net/Books/Online_books/Bg/gita_1.html

From Wacky-Piddly:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varna_(Hinduism)

Varna (Sanskrit वर्ण varṇa, literally “cover, coat; colour”[1] ) refers to the main division of Hindu society into four social classes. This quadruple division is not to be confused with the much finer division of the contemporary caste system in India.[2] The four varnas or Chatur varna as they are mentioned in ancient texts:
▪ the brahmins: scholars and clergy;
▪ the kshatriyas: warriors and administrators;
▪ the shudras: laborers ;
▪ the vaishyas: agriculturists, artisans and merchants

Another voice from India might explain this phenomenon:

AS I PASS through my incarnations in every age and race,
I make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market Place.
Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.

We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn
That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn:
But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind,
So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind.

We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace,
Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market Place,
But they always caught up with our progress, and presently word would come
That a tribe had been wiped off its icefield, or the lights had gone out in Rome.

With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch,
They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch;
They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings;
So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things.

When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace.
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “Stick to the Devil you know.”

On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life
(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)
Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “The Wages of Sin is Death.”

In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”

Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew
And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true
That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more.

As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man
There are only four things certain since Social Progress began.
That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;

And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

Advertisements

‘a policy of trying to force diversity is social poison’ but I’m watching riots and recalling Jacob Zuma and “Zigzag” Marzah

Currently in the comment thread at:
http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/globalguerrillas/2010/07/links-2-july-2010.html

we have andrew kieran arguing with abprosper:

andrew kieran said in reply to John Walters…
does diversity only count when people speak a different language to you, or are of a different colour? cause if you ask me the only serious terrorist threat britain’s ever faced has been overspill from the continuing Irish Civil War. Muslim bombers have committed one successful atrocity in this country (britain) since the UK joined the holy war. The IRA bombed every major city in england, assassinated members of the british elite, and caused endless havoc back home in ireland. and the UDA were just as bad. Both these groups have very strong ethnic enclaves in scotland, ireland and england.

Should i perhaps seek a national homeland where there are no protestants then, because we obviously just can’t get on?

Maybe i should disown my protestant friends, as they have a different culture from me. While i’m at it, i’d better defriend Omar and Noshine, because their ethno-national interest is contrary to mine.

whatever. you go off and hide in your little white-washed ethnic enclave like those pathetic white people that live in fortresses on hackney road thinking the blacks on the street want to do nothing but rob them.

i’ve lived in a lot of different areas with a wide variety of demographic makeups and the only constant variable that goes hand in hand with violence is poverty. there’s violence in black ghettoes, there’s violence in white ghettoes, there’s violence in multi-cultural ghettoes, there’s violence on traveller sites and there’s violence in marginalised communes.

and to round it off, i’d like to go back to my original point about the irish conflict. in scotland find catholic ghettoes and protestant ghettoes in glasgow. Guess what. these places are the worst shitholes in the country. they have no vibrancy, no life, just mistrust, suspicion, hatred, fear and violence. not just against the other but against any other race or social class.

if you want to go live in an ethnically homogenous cultural dead-zone go ahead, but don’t come crying to me when your kids grow up without hope because you’ve shut yourself off from the cultural mainstream

Reply Friday, 09 July 2010 at 08:25 PM
abprosper said in reply to andrew kieran…
Your last phrase there made no sense whatsoever. Cultural mainstream? I assume you meant “state and media constructed” culture there?

Real culture flows from face to face social interaction which if the studies are correct, are inhibited by the very diversity that you are trying to construct.

And without hope, please. Kids grow up in mono-cultural enclaves and come out great. Happy,educated, well adjusted and entirely excellent citizens all the time.

And while I agree that poverty is a component, so is instinct ,which is really what this is about.

“Not like me” goes deeper than learned behavior. Its instinct and while we as a species can learn to see others as like us, this is by no means automatic or even possible.

Humans are in part xenophobic because of our DNA. Heck if Robin Dunbar is correct, our brains have trouble seeing more than a few hundred people as “people” even when they are like us

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number

Expecting us to form heterogeneous societies because a certain segment of humanity craves novelty or there is a political agenda in play is folly. When times get tough, people Tribe Up

As to your point about the Irish, well yeah.

Identity is not related to skin color. Its an issue of culture (of which skin color is a part) not just race and religion. Irish needs are different than English needs and there will be friction. Its probably easier to see Irish are “people like us” because they are fair skinned but given the amount of discrimination and bigotry they have faced, I doubt its a whole lot.

As far as your friends “defriend?” , I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you mean people you spend face to face time with, not some cyber-bud whose friendship is utterly meaningless

No one is telling you not to hang out with whoever you like. Thats not the issue. Nor is anyone telling you that you shouldn’t create multi cultural enclaves if you can manage it and you prefer that culture to the culture that a monocultural enclave will have

What they are saying is on the aggregate is for most people diversity is over valued for human happiness and that implies that a policy of trying to force diversity is social poison

I would like to thank abprosper for taking up the cudgels.

Right now, I would like to reply at length, but I am too busy watching riots induced by ethnic diversity.

http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_15473431?nclick_check=1

OAKLAND — The agitators have struck again.
After about three hours of passionate but largely peaceful protests by hundreds of people who converged on downtown Oakland late Thursday afternoon, a splinter group of protesters, many wearing masks, egged on the crowd and ran through the streets breaking store windows, looting and setting fires before police moved in with flash-bang grenades.
People started pouring into the intersection at 14th Street and Broadway after the surprisingly quick verdict in the Johannes Mehserle trial. The former BART police officer was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter for the fatal shooting of Oscar Grant III on Jan. 1, 2009.
Police officers, while visible and prepared, allowed the crowd of about 1,000 to block the street and set up a podium. One after the other, speakers grabbed a bullhorn to express grief and anger. Many urged the crowd to keep the protest peaceful, and by 8 p.m. there were only a few arrests for fighting with police and instances of rocks being thrown by a smaller group that tried unsuccessfully to march down Broadway toward police headquarters.
But all that changed after dark. By 10:30 violent protesters had left a trail of destruction down Broadway and throughout Uptown, smashing windows and looting. They hit Foot Locker and Sears — even ripping clothing from mannequins. Windows were smashed at Far East National Bank, Luka’s Taproom, Ozumo
Advertisement

Japanese, Oaksterdam University, Oakland Coin and Jewelry Exchange, Whole Foods, Grace Beauty Supply, JC Jewelry, the Acura dealership showroom, Wells Fargo, California Bank and Trust, US Bank and Bank of the West.

I am so mesmerized by this triumph of diversity that I can barely recall the victories of diverse South Africa.

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1906000,00.html

South Africans received a horrifying measure of just how bad their country’s rape crisis is with the release this week of a study in which more than a quarter of men admitted to having raped, and 46% of those said that they had raped more than once.
The study, conducted by South Africa’s Medical Research Council, reveals a deeply rooted culture of violence against women, in which men rape in order to feel powerful, and do so with impunity, believing that their superiority entitles them to vent their frustrations on women and children. The men most likely to rape, the researchers found, were not the poorest, but those who had attained some level of education and income.
(See pictures of South Africa, Fifteen Years On.)
Researchers interviewed 1,738 men of all race groups, in both urban and rural settings in the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal, provinces marked by high rates of AIDS and poverty, and the men answered questions about rape and HIV using small handheld computers in order to guarantee anonymity. Of those admitting rape, 73% said that they had committed their first assault before the age of 20. According to the researchers, many of the study’s participants appeared to see no problem with what they had done. These findings, says Mbuyiselo Botha, a senior program advisor at Sonke Gender Justice, an advocacy group for abused women, “highlight the lack of remorse among men in our country, and also the attitude that women remain fair game for us.” Men, says Botha, “continue to abuse even to the point of getting away with murder.”
South Africa has one of the highest incidents of reported rape in the world. The most recent statistics show that 36,190 cases of rape were reported to the police between April and December 2007, though experts believe that number only accounts for one out of nine cases. But the number of rape cases that make it to court — let alone result in a conviction — are far fewer.
Researchers said that many of the perpetrators reported having bullied or been bullied. The study also underscores the huge divide between South Africa’s liberal constitution, which enshrines the rights of women and children, and “the realities of a society where poverty, inequality and violence are rife.”
Gender advocates say that the 2006 rape trial of prominent politician Jacob Zuma was incredibly damaging to their cause. Zuma, who was elected President this year, was tried and acquitted of raping an HIV-positive family friend. He told the court that the woman had dressed provocatively, in a traditional wrap-around kanga, and that it was against Zulu culture for a man to leave a sexually aroused woman unsatisfied.

However, any shortcomings of diversity can be rectified by traditional ethnic folkways, such as are still practiced in Liberia:
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1334959020080313

(Reuters) – Former Liberian President Charles Taylor ordered his militias to eat the flesh of captured enemies and U.N. soldiers, a former close aide testified on Thursday at Taylor’s war crimes trial.

“He (Taylor) said we should eat them. Even the U.N. white people — he said we could use them as pork to eat,” Joseph “ZigZag” Marzah, who described himself as Taylor’s former death squad commander, told the U.N.-backed Special Court for Sierra Leone.

Now, with an appropriate celebration of diversity in mind, let me address the points one by one:

does diversity only count when people speak a different language to you, or are of a different colour?

Diversity can arise from any factor; humans, of course, have a great deal of natural variation in both physical and mental state. Even if one selects a community of genetically similar persons, one will find mental diversity, demographic diversity, etc.

Because “diversity” is so vague, no one can object to the slogan “celebrate diversity,” no matter how much rape and cannibalism might be going on.

cause if you ask me the only serious terrorist threat britain’s ever faced has been overspill from the continuing Irish Civil War. Muslim bombers have committed one successful atrocity in this country (britain) since the UK joined the holy war. The IRA bombed every major city in england, assassinated members of the british elite, and caused endless havoc back home in ireland. and the UDA were just as bad. Both these groups have very strong ethnic enclaves in scotland, ireland and england.

Well, I feel bad about that because the Irish might have inadvertently killed some of their lower-class British brothers, instead of hitting the plutocrats, kakistocrats, and kleptocrats who run the British Empire. I don’t much like empires; I prefer Jeffersonian republics. However, my feelings are not going to accomplish much until I translate them into actions.

Should i perhaps seek a national homeland where there are no protestants then, because we obviously just can’t get on?

I don’t know if you tend to riot in the presence of Protestants. If you can’t control yourself around Protestants, then don’t live near them.

Maybe i should disown my protestant friends, as they have a different culture from me. While i’m at it, i’d better defriend Omar and Noshine, because their ethno-national interest is contrary to mine.

Don’t worry, the people who say that they’re your friends are probably just being polite, so you probably won’t lose much if you stop hanging out with them.

you go off and hide in your little white-washed ethnic enclave like those pathetic white people that live in fortresses on hackney road thinking the blacks on the street want to do nothing but rob them.

If I saw a bunch of rioters burning ambulances near me, I don’t think I would limit myself to hiding. I would probably run far, far away, and then hide.

i’ve lived in a lot of different areas with a wide variety of demographic makeups and the only constant variable that goes hand in hand with violence is poverty. there’s violence in black ghettoes, there’s violence in white ghettoes, there’s violence in multi-cultural ghettoes, there’s violence on traveller sites and there’s violence in marginalised communes.

Thanks for the detailed anthropological analysis. I assume you’ll let us know when you publish your findings in Nature.

in scotland find catholic ghettoes and protestant ghettoes in glasgow. Guess what. these places are the worst shitholes in the country.

Well, then, clearly there’s nothing to do but to kick Scotland out of the United Kingdom so that it can develop its community life free from the interference of the UK central government.

Come to think of it, Wales, England, and Northern Ireland would all probably be happier as small, independent states, and the queen could limit herself to being Queen of England. Everyone could sit around and read G. K. Chesterton and Hillaire Belloc’s thoughts on why “Little England” is a better choice than the “British Empire.”

if you want to go live in an ethnically homogenous cultural dead-zone go ahead, but don’t come crying to me when your kids grow up without hope because you’ve shut yourself off from the cultural mainstream

Darn it to heck! I had been planning on having a bunch of kids, making them miserable, and then going crying to Andrew Kieran! Well, now that plan has to be scrapped, and I’m back to the old drawing board.

Kevin MacDonald announces Chapter 18 of 200 Years Together

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Solzhenitsyn-200-Years-Together-18.html

The English translation of Chapter 18 of 200 Years Together, “The 1920s” is now available.

The Much-Needed Biological Insights on Nationalism

Occidental Dissent is discussing:

Why I’m a Nationalist.

And I must conclude:

One can admit that gene theft works and yet claim that gene theft is dishonorable, immoral, contrary to the will of God, etc. One might claim that gene theft has long-term disadvantages. One might even claim that gene theft is moral for some ethnies but not moral for others.

I don’t particularly think that the white race stands to benefit from gene theft. However, I think it is a real sociobiological issue that deserves scientific attention.

So, “inviting” intermarriage from other ethnies comes down to obtaining their genes, in order to serve the long-term survivability of the whites, right?

For the moment, I will assume that this can be kept under control and it would be possible to admit new genes without losing white genes.

I think such a gene pool would be too large to be called a “nation” in any reasonable sense. White Americans could still be a nation, but the white gene pool would not be a nation.

I have a lot of science that I need to catch up on. I am a staunch enthusiast of traditional white culture – Kipling and Revilo Oliver and so on – but at the moment, I think I need to sacrifice my enjoyment of white culture to build up my understanding of white genetics.

Possibly the first step would be a detailed refutation of “The Race Question” by Ashley Montagu.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Race_Question

My first stop on the journey is the Indispensable Pundit, Steve Sailer.

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/071203_iq.htm

and

http://www.vdare.com/Sailer/071216_race_faq.htm


Q. Isn’t race just a social construct?

A. Relatedness is the most real thing in the world: mother, father, baby.

Q. But, don’t different societies have different rules about who is considered to be related to whom?

A. Yes. Indeed, every culture comes up with a way to deal with the exponential unwieldiness of family trees.

For many purposes of daily life, you have too many relatives. The sheer numbers of ancestors, distant cousins, and potential descendents you have expand out beyond any manageable boundaries. The amount of relatives you’ll send a Christmas card to might be larger than the number you’ll volunteer to cook Thanksgiving dinner for, but, still, there’s got to be an end to everything.

Many cultures have devised rules to limit who counts as a relative for the purposes of, say, inheritance. English aristocratic families didn’t want their land holdings divided up into unimpressive and inefficient parcels, so they followed the rule of primogeniture, passing the claim to be of noble blood down through the first-born son, with latter-borns falling out of the aristocracy within two generations. For instance, Mr. Winston Churchill was the first-born son of Lord Randolph Churchill, who was the second-born son of the Duke of Marlborough. That seems awfully aristocratic to us plebian Americans, but by English law, he wasn’t a peer because his father wasn’t first-born. And thus, to Winston’s political benefit, his parliamentary career was spent in the House of Commons rather than the House of Lords.

The Chinese treated sons more equitably, but almost completely ignored daughters.

In contrast to these attempts to nominally define down the putative number of relations, many Middle Eastern cultures have come up with an actual biological solution (of sorts) to reduce the number of relatives: cousin marriage. In Iraq, half of all married couples are first or second cousins.

Q. Why?

A. One reason is this: If you marry your daughter off to your brother’s son, then your grandchildren/heirs will also be your brother’s grandchildren/heirs. So, there is less cause for strife among brothers. Cousin marriage helps make family loyalties especially strong in Iraq, to the detriment of national loyalties.

Q. Do you ever want more relatives?

A. For many political struggles, the more the merrier.

Ibn Saud, who founded Saudi Arabia in the 1920s, consolidated his victory over other desert chieftains by marrying 22 women, typically the daughters of his former rivals. Thus, today’s vast Saudi ruling family represents the intermixing of the tribes, which has helped it survive in power for 80 years.

On the other hand, the wealthy Syrian Jews of Brooklyn, with few political threats hanging over them here in America, don’t need blood relations with other power centers, so the community fiercely ostracizes anyone who marries outside it.

Or, political entrepreneurs can attempt to widen or narrow their followers’ working definition of who their relatives are by rhetorical means. For example, in the 1960s, black leaders encouraged African-Americans to call each other “brother” and “sister” to build solidarity.

Q. In America, wasn’t there a “one-drop rule” for determining if one is a minority?

A. For blacks, yes: for American Indians, no. Herbert Hoover’s VP, Charles Curtis, was famous for being 1/8th Kaw Indian. Being a little bit Indian added glamour to his image.

Indian nations have the right to set ancestry minimums (generally, at least 1/4th) required for legal membership in the tribe, and they often police membership with a vengeance.

Q. Isn’t all this outdated?

A. Both blacks and Indians are standing by the traditional definitions, because it’s in their interests.

Ever since Congress allowed Indian nations to each own one casino in the late 1980s, many tribes have been expelling racially marginal members to increase the slice of the pie for the more pure-blooded remainder. That’s because the main benefit of belonging to a tribe—the rake-off from a single casino—is finite.

In contrast, black and Hispanic organizations have backed broad, inclusive definitions of who is black or Hispanic because the rake-off from being black or Hispanic—affirmative action quotas—is indefinite in magnitude. The larger the percentage of the population, the larger the quota, and the larger the number of voters who are beneficiaries and thus supporters.

Q. So cultures change their definitions of who deserves to be a relative?

A. Not just cultures, but individuals change their definitions to fit their needs at the moment.

For example, right before the Battle of Agincourt, King Henry V needed all the loyal relatives, real or exaggerated, he could get, so Shakespeare has him address the English army:

“We few, we happy few, we band of brothers

For he to-day that sheds his blood with me

Shall be my brother”.

On the other hand, once the bloodshed was over, King Henry probably wasn’t inclined to let his old yeomen archers come over and hang around the palace whenever they liked as if they were his actual brothers.

Q. So, leaders can persuade their followers to see themselves as more or less closely related?

A. Yes, but the more they follow existing genealogical fault lines, the more likely they are to succeed.

Q. What’s an ethnic group?

A. The Census Bureau draws a sharp distinction between race and ethnicity, stating that individuals of Hispanic ethnicity can be of any race. The way the federal government uses the terms can be formalized like this:

A racial group is a partly inbred extended biological family.

An ethnic group is one defined by shared traits that are often passed down within biological families—e.g., language, surname, religion, cuisine, accent, self-identification, historical or mythological heroes, musical styles, etc.—but that don’t require genetic relatedness.
Q. Can you give an example?

A. The difference is perhaps easiest to see with adopted children. For example, if, say, an Armenian baby is adopted by Icelanders, his ethnicity would be Icelandic, at least until he became a teen and decided to rebel against his parents by searching out and espousing his Armenian heritage. But racially, he’d always have been Armenian.

Q. If races exist, doesn’t that mean one race has to be the supreme Master Race? And that would be awful!

A. Indeed it would, but no race is going to be best at everything – any more than one region could be the supreme master region for all human purposes.

For example, a mountaintop is a stirring place to put a Presidential Library. But if you want to break the land speed record in your rocket car, it’s definitely inferior to the Bonneville Salt Flats.

Wanted: A Scientific Analysis of the Effects of Miscegenation

Many advocates of white ethnic interests seem to take it as self-evident that miscegenation is collective suicide.

Recently I wrote:
For the moment, I can only ask: “Miscegenation: is it good for whites?” and hope that a real sociobiologist can answer that question.

A commenter replied:
‘Miscegenation is a paraphilia, it is a sign of mental derangement.’

If that claim can be shown with the scholarly rigor typically demonstrated by Kevin MacDonald’s sociobiology books, I would be happy to publicize that.

Kevin MacDonald has written about a specific form of miscegenation, the one-way flow of genes as a group evolutionary strategy. It may be that the one-way flow of genes is indicative of mental derangement, but I think such a claim needs to be shown scientifically.

Miscegenation, on a group level, may indeed be suicidal. However, a serious book on the order of A People That Shall Dwell Alone might be needed in order to prove that miscegenation is suicide for an ethnic group.

A review of the cited book is available at:

http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_macdon.htm

A working hypothesis concerning gene theft

I was reminded of Kevin MacDonald’s writings on the “one way flow of genes” between of groups when I read:

I have a working-hypothesis, which is: for the past few centuries, ethnic Jews settled in Europe, the USA, and other White nations have been attempting to steal the genes of many social, political, religious, and/or economic elites of White/European descent by enticing them to intermarry with ethnic Jews and bring them in to the ‘Jewish fold’ by using various Jewish incentives, mostly ill-begotten money and the consequent rise in socioeconomic status.

For a long time in Europe, especially in Eastern/Slavic Europe, Ashkenazi Jews were what might be called ‘royal helpers’ who assisted the native royals in wielding power over the native peasant-classes — those Jewish assistants were tax collectors, bureaucrats, shopkeepers, scribes, and so on for the Eastern European/Slavic royalty. Now, they did this for many centuries; thus it is obvious that a certain amount of genetic flow occurred between those European royals and their Jewish helpers.

In more recent times, elite Whites in Europe, the USA, Australia, and so on have seen the rise of ethnically Jewish businesspeople, Jewish media-influence, and so on coupled with a consequent fall in their own status even within their own nations; thus, once Jews had managed to infiltrate and slowly seized control of a nation’s power-centers, they then sought to intermarry with the former native elite in order to gain their prized elite genes. This also has the added bonus of gaining the physical appearance of the natives in order to allay growing suspicions about Jewish power/influence.

In the Czarist regime, there was certainly a lot of this mixing between Slavic elites and their Jewish assistants occurring, and also in the USSR when the Jews rose high in the Soviet system and began to intermarry with some of the previous Czarist Era ruling class of ‘Old Believers.’ This mixing between Jews and the native non-Jewish aristocratic/royal class has also occurred majorly in the UK…

http://whitesurvival.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/jewish-gene-theft-a-hypothesis/

I think I’ll need to add that blog to my link list…

The Bio-Rational Institute

Have I mentioned that you can get free evolutionary psychology information from the Bio-Rational Institute?

http://www.biorationalinstitute.com/shownews.php?category=about